Wildlife Biology in Practice, Vol 1, No 1 (2005)

Wildl. Biol. Pract., 2005; 1(1); 33-40;

Open Access Policy
Online ISSN: 1646-2742
doi: 10.2461/wbp.2005.1.5
Copyright © 2005 Costa, Petronilho, Vingada.
Published by: Portuguese Wildlife Society

Creative Commons License This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The electronic version of this article can be found at:
http://www.socpvs.org/journals/index.php/wbp/article/view/10.2461-wbp.2005.1.5

Breeding biology of the Great Tit in two maritime pine forests in the region of Figueira da Foz (Beira Litoral, Portugal)

  • R. Costa *
    Rua da Escola, n.º 59 Carritos, 3080-843 Figueira da Foz, Portugal.
  • J. Petronilho *
  • J. Vingada *
    Universidade do Minho & Sociedade Portuguesa de Vida Selvagem, Dept. Biologia, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.

Abstract


During the spring of 2003 some aspects of the breeding biology of the Great Tit Parus major were studied in two maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) forests of Figueira da Foz, using nest boxes. One study site was located in Mata Nacional do Urso (MU), close to an industrial area and the other was located in Mata Nacional de Quiaios (MQ), a forested area with no direct influence of industrial pollution. The total occupation rate of nest boxes for all species was significantly higher in MQ, but the nest-boxes occupation rates by Great Tits were similar in both areas. The number of fledglings per pair, hatching success, survival rate and breeding success were similar between the two study areas. However, clutch size and brood size were marginally significantly larger in MU. Therefore, the results provide evidence that breeding close to an industrial complex does not influence directly the Great Tit, but it may affect others species that also breed in nest boxes. Interspecific competition mechanisms seem to be more important in the breeding biology of the Great Tit, which might dissimulate the effects induced by pollution.


Printer Friendly PDF

Keywords

breeding biology; Parus major.

References

1. Pitelka, L.F. 1994. Air polution and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 4: 627-628.

2. Eeva, T. 1996. Direct and indirect effects of air pollution on two hole-nesting bird species. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis 83: 1-11.

3. Newton, I. 1998. Population Limitation in Birds. Academic Press. London.

4. Root, M. 1990. Biological monitors of pollution. Bioscience 40: 83-86.

5. Fidalgo, L.G.Z. 1988. Contribuição para o estudo da biologia de reprodução dos parídeos nidificantes na Reserva Natural das Dunas de S. Jacinto (Contribution to the biological study of nesting paridaeís in the Natural Reserve of S. Jacintoís Dunes). Graduation Report. Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa.

6. Van Balen, J.H. 1973. A comparative study of the breeding ecology of the Great Tit Parus major in different habitats. Ardea 61: 1-93.

7. Lindén, M. 1988. Reproductive trade-off between first and second clutches in the Great Tits Parus major: an experimental study. Oikos 51: 285-290.

8. Cramp, S. & Perrins, C. M. 1993. The birds of Western Paleartic, Vol VII. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

9. Martins, T. 1999. Contribuição para o conhecimento da biologia da reprodução do Chapim-real e do Chapim-azul num montado de sobro do Baixo Alentejo. Relatório de estágio. (Contribution to the reproductive biology knowledge of Great and Blue Tits, in a cork oak forest of Alto Alentejo). Graduation Report. Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa.

10. Tenreiro, P.J.Q., Carvalho, C.M.M., Alves, H.M.D., Martins, J.C. & Fernandes, C.N. 2001. Contribuição para o estudo da biologia de reprodução dos Parídeos na Região Centro de Portugal. (Contribution to the reproductive biology study of Paridae in the Central Region of Portugal). III Congresso de Ornitologia da Sociedade Portuguesa para o Estudo das Aves. SPEA, Castelo Branco.

11. Svensson, L. 1992. Identification Guide to European Passerines. 4th ed. Fingraf AB, Sweden.

12. Kaiser, A. 1993. A new multi-category classification of subcutaneous fat deposits of songbirds. J. Field Ornithol. 62:246-255.

13. Bairlein, F. 1994. Manual of field methods. European-African songbird migration network. Institut fur Vogelforschung, Wilhelmshaven.

14. Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall. London.

15. Noordwijk, A.J. 1990. The effects of forest damage on caterpillars and their effect on the breeding biology of the great tit, an overview. In: Blondel, J., A.G. Gobler, J.D. Lebreton & McCleery, R.H. (eds.) Population Biology of Passerine Birds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp 215-222.

16. Eeva, T. and Lehikoinen, E. 1996. Growth and mortality of nestlings Great Tits (Parus major) and Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in a heavy metal pollution gradient. Oecologia 108: 631-639.
doi: 10.1007/BF00329036.

17. Eens, M., Pinxten, R., Verheyen, R. F., Blust, R. and Bervoets, L. 1999. Great and Blue Tits as indicators of heavy metal contamination in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 44: 81-85.
doi: 10.1006/eesa.1999.1828.

18. Minot, E.O. 1981. Effects of interspecific competition for food in breeding Blue and Great Tits. J. Anim. Ecol. 50: 375-385.
doi: 10.2307/4061.